NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Gay marriage ban attracts big money in Calif.
By LISA LEFF
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you need to hear from the President-elect on the economy?

Supporters and opponents of a ballot initiative that would outlaw same-sex marriage in California have poured $41.2 million into the race, more than the combined total spent in the 24 states where similar measures have gone before voters since 2004.

Campaign finance figures show supporters of the gay marriage ban have taken a significant lead in fundraising even as Proposition 8 has lagged in public opinion polls. A backer, ProtectMarriage.com, reported taking in $25.4 million through Sept. 30 of this year compared to the $15.8 million in donations raised by the main committee opposing the measure.

"It shows there is tremendous grassroots support for what we are trying to do," said Frank Schubert, co-manager of the gay marriage ban campaign.

Schubert said more than 60,000 people and businesses have given money to help pass the initiative, which would amend the state constitution to limit marriage to a man and a woman. He provided the figures Monday before the group filed its official fundraising report with the secretary of state's office to meet the reporting deadline.

Steve Smith, manager of Equality for All, a coalition of groups working to defeat the gay marriage ban, predicted the bank accounts for the two sides would even up by Election Day on Nov. 4. He noted that when the last campaign finance reports were filed at the end of July, the proposition's opponents were ahead.

"What's happening is a little seesaw battle," Smith said.

Both sides have set aside more than $10 million for television advertisements and plan to start airing their second round of ads this week. The fundraising advantage Proposition 8's supporters have at this point is reflected in the remaining cash on hand they reported having on Monday _ $12.8 million for supporters of the ban, $1.8 million for its opponents.

According to figures compiled by the National Organization on Money in State Politics, a little less than $33 million was spent on campaigns to pass or defeat gay marriage bans in the 24 states where they appeared on ballots in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Supporters of same-sex marriage had the fundraising edge in all of them, but voters approved all but one, in Arizona.

With a month to go until the election, fundraising by the two sides in the California campaign already has well exceeded that amount. By comparison, the most expensive gay marriage fight before now was in Colorado, where opponents and supporters spent $6.8 million in 2006.

"For an issue like this, it's a lot of money," said Rachel Weiss, a spokeswoman for the national Organization on Money in State Politics. "California is in its own universe."

___

Associated Press writer Steve Lawrence in Sacramento contributed to this story.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
Subject: Kathy
---Whether people are born gay, or have issues with mommy, the homosexual behavior is what is at issue.
And that behavior is destructive for those involved in it, and the society that has to pay for the results of that behavior.---

Can you give us one fact in support of your opposition to gay marriage?

Stuart

Dreadnaught
Stu:". . . there is no good evidence-based argument against gay marriage. No harm will happen, no existing marriage is in any way debased,"

---What's your point? Your point is that fwllatio and sphincter-harpooning are just as marital as the normal marital --act.---

Did I say that? I don’t think I did. Anyway it is probably true that indeed those acts are part of the sex life of many heterosexual couples.

---Well; Prop 8 is in fact returning power to the people of California. Once before WE stated the will of the people:
Man/Woman with no impediments, equals true MARRIAGE. Whereupon, the gay lobby went to the Supremes and unlawfully had the WILL of the PEOPLE circumvented. But now we'll see it carried out.---

What one fact supports the sentiment that gay people should be denied the right to express their relationship in the same way as other couples, with all the recognition and benefits of that?

Stu:". . . no earthquakes or hurricanes will strike because of it."

---How do you know, Stu? It was otherwise once; in Sodom & Gomorrah. Be that as it may---

I don’t know for certain. But it is pretty obvious that there is no causal relationship between human behaviour and the occurrence of earthquakes. Only in the heads of the religiously deluded do those fairy tales lie.

Stu:"All t[h]is money is being wasted on conservative bigotry."

---Izzat so? Were your Mama and Papa also bigots? Just because they're heterosexuals? Personally, I'm no bigot. I don't approve of any discrimination against law-abiding gays. ---

What have my parents got to do with it? Do you know them? You reject gay discrimination, except on marriage? One fact in support of your case might help.

Stuart
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: