NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Dennis Prager :: Townhall.com Columnist
Some Thoughts on Love
by Dennis Prager
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sen Obama get a bounce from the convention?

With Valentine's Day approaching, some thoughts on love.

1. The love relationship between a man and a woman is unique. There is no love like it for two primary reasons: First, it is the love of equals -- all other love relationships (except same-sex friends) are between unequals. Second, it is sexual.

2. Because it is the only love relationship between equals (again except for friends), it is the only relationship in which it is a good thing to seek to be loved. In other relationships, it is bad to seek to be loved. Parents who seek to be loved by their children will inevitably do a poor job as a parent. They may even damage their child. Leaders who seek to be loved by the public will be ineffective at best and dangerous at worst. One can only lead if he does not yearn to be loved. A teacher who tries to be loved by her students will likewise fail. Parents, leaders, teachers have jobs to do, and seeking to be loved compromises their ability to do those jobs properly. They should seek to do the right thing, and doing the right thing often means being not loved, even hated. If they seek any response from those they lead, it should be respect, not love.

But in the love of equals -- i.e., the love between a man and a woman and the love of friends -- it is not only all right to seek to be loved, it is a good thing. Taking the love of a spouse or friend for granted is perhaps the single greatest cause of marital divorce and the breakup of friendships. "What can I do to ensure his/her continuing love?" is a wonderful thing to keep in mind.

3. That is one reason the notion of "unconditional love" is foolish. The fact is, we all earn love, and it is a good thing to have to do so. What possible good purpose can the belief that your spouse loves you unconditionally -- i.e., no matter how you act -- serve? If we believe our spouse loves us no matter what we do, what would motivate us to be on our best behavior at all times? Why be kind even when we are in a foul mood? Why work to stay attractive if he will love me no matter how much I neglect how I look? Why continue to pay attention to her -- like regularly calling her from work -- if I know that even if I ignore her, she will continue to love me?

Unconditional love is not a good idea. I don't know where it originated, but I am quite certain it's relatively recent, a product of an age that has put primary importance on feelings. With the possible exception of a parent's love for a young child, unconditional love is not a good idea among people, and it's probably not a good idea concerning God's love for us. I am familiar with no biblical basis for the notion that God loves us no matter how much cruelty and evil we engage in (God's love of His Chosen People, Israel, is specifically depicted as conditional upon Israel's behavior), or for the notion that God loved Adolf Hitler and Mother Teresa equally. Frankly, I would be disappointed in such a God. It renders Him a love machine whose love cannot be affected by our behavior, not a loving being who is affected by how we act. It renders His love amoral. And it prevents us from growing up.

4. "God is love" is a half-truth. God is many things, and love is only one of them. One can just as accurately say "God is punishment" or "God is justice" or "God is truth."

5. We show love to those we love by doing what they consider loving, not necessarily by what we consider loving. A young man once called my radio show and told me he was not planning to give his girlfriend flowers or even a card, or to do anything special for her on Valentine's Day. His reason was that he considered Valentine's Day a creation of American capitalism -- just another way to sell cards, flowers and gift items and increase companies' profits. I asked him if his girlfriend agreed with him about the insignificance of Valentine's Day. He said she didn't, that, in fact, she thought it important that he do something special for her on Valentine's Day.

I then asked him if he considered birthdays special and expected his girlfriend to do or get something special for him on his birthday. He said he did. How would he react, I then asked, if his girlfriend dismissed the significance of birthdays the way he dismissed the importance of Valentine's Day and ignored his birthday? He acknowledged that he would be hurt.

Just as his girlfriend should make his birthday special whether or not she believes in the importance of birthdays, he should make Valentine's Day special for her whether or not he deems the day special. We show love to the other in the way he or she understands it, not the way we do.

6. Finally, to the extent that emotions can be measured, it may be difficult to say whether love or hate is the stronger emotion. But this can be said with certainty: Among the psychologically healthy and morally decent, there is no comparison. Love is the most powerful force in our life. And the more the merrier.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dennis Prager is a radio show host, contributing columnist for Townhall.com, and author of 4 books including Happiness Is a Serious Problem: A Human Nature Repair Manual.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dennis Prager's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: btw...
Young Lawrence King's organs were donated. In death he has given the gift of life or raised the quality of life for several people.
He was shot in the face and kept on life support until his organs could be harvested.
That was a gesture of love on the part of HIS poor, grieving parents.
And yes, gay people have parents and children that would mourn them.
I attended a vigil for Lawrence King, a woman I admire said this:

"Young Brian McInerney pulled the trigger. But hate for gay people loaded the gun."
I have tried until I'm blue that working in law enforcement has given me perspective that no one here seriously has wanted to engage.
I have Dennis Prager a serious run for his pomposity when we had a talk about gays in the military.
We have been friends and participated in discussions right on his radio program in studio together.
I reminded him that gays represented a thin protective line between him and his military eligible and PRIVILEDGED son. Were they not there, the draft might be implemented and perhaps he might regret not understanding the brave role that gay soldiers are playing in protecting not only his own son's freedom, but very priviledged life he hasn't been as eager to risk.
Dennis told me I tended to disturb him more than most people he spoke to.
And yes, I'll keep doing it to remind people of their moral inconsistency. Always.

your way
Your way or that of others here with either ignorance or animus regarding gay people have had their way for a long, long time now. A period of adjustment is necessary. But the shooting death of young Lawrence King puts things in perspective. This happened only last week. He was fourteen years old and his killing happened in front of his teacher and entire class in their classroom. Had his killer been taught the value of even a gay life...it wouldn't have happened.
And why NOT teach that a gay child's life, and then a gay adult's life DOES have value?
As we speak there are groups that don't want children to be taught that. They sue the state and the schools over allowing such education IN AN EDUCATIONAL environment that's OBLIGATED to teach children to get along.
There IS no justification for this protest. There is NO justification to compromise important education that could have PREVENTED this incident.
You haven't, nor do so many so called 'family values' advocates come up with ANY alternative ideas to preventing such violence. NONE.
The solution is VERY CLEAR. But, too many people resist it.
Well WHY?
If it could have saved this boy's life? Or all the other children who either were murdered or committed suicide over anti gay epithet. One doesn't actually have to be gay to get such treatment in school and no protection by educators, clergy or other parents.
This should be unconsionable to you.
ALL children need to be taught about treating another person as they'd want to be treated. Period.
However, even adults are teaching children that gay people are fair exceptions to that most important of social rules and without justification.
Disgusting.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2: