NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Bill Murchison :: Townhall.com Columnist
Et Tu, Scott?
by Bill Murchison
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you want to hear more about Bill Ayers?

Frankly, some American with minimal regard for political correctness should consider chasing the so-and-so down the street, cracking an instrument of encouragement associated with Indiana Jones, crying: "Outta here, you bum! And don't come back!"

I speak in deliberately old-fashioned cadences regarding the deserts of a decidedly new-fashioned public figure, namely, Scott McClellan, who is, as you know, the onetime press secretary to President Bush. McClellan, a Texan, I am sad to note, being a Texan myself, has distinguished himself -- or something -- for beating up on his former boss in a new book.

I mention the aforesaid so-and-so not to wrestle with his contentions, which, who knows, may have elements of insight. I mention him in order to say, good Lord almighty, whatever happened to honor, whatever happened to the civilized practice of declining to stab your benefactor in the back the moment that portion of his anatomy presents itself? Et tu, Scott?

I think it entirely possible, reflecting on Scott McClellan, retired press secretary, greedy seeker of public notice, to imagine modern society afflicted by far worse things than unpopular foreign wars. By the habit of personal treason, let's say.

Here's a guy who wouldn't have a book out at all but for the decision of his longtime friend and patron George W. Bush to put him forth as administration spokesman, thus bringing him to public notice and recognition. Oh, well. A publisher waves a roll of bills in his face, and Scott McClellan discovers he had been all along peddling nonsense and deception about Iraq. And about the Valerie Plame affair, need we drag that old chestnut once more into view?

Correspondingly, Scott McClellan feels the need to babble in print and on television, just when -- as he would certainly know -- Iraq policy remains an issue crucial to the presidential campaign and our national life.

I don't believe a single one of us wishes to trammel Scott McClellan's free speech rights -- to insist he can't babble. The point lies elsewhere besides the mouth -- namely, the soul. And not just the soul of Scott McClellan, hardly a large enough figure to typify the spiritual crisis of which he is a conspicuous part.

Stabbing a patron in the back for money isn't precisely new. Macbeth, for one, did it with less transparency but higher hopes than our boy Scott. There was a certain grandeur in Macbeth's aspirations. He wanted to be king -- or anyway, Lady M. wanted it for him. McClellan wanted ... what? Higher fees on the speaking circuit? The settlement of old scores? Possibly the burnishing of a reputation he felt tarnished by his tour as a front man? Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Bill Murchison is a senior columns writer for The Dallas Morning News and author of There's More to Life Than Politics.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Bill Murchison's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate ©Creators Syndicate
Subject: inthemajority asks:
Here's a gloater who asks:

[He thinks it's] "correct all along it is not called 20-20 hindsight, is it dread? Are you not now saying that Jack is correct, and that you fail to have even the hindsight to understand that Boosh is an idiot?"

No-- I don't say anything I don't know for sure. And Scott only said what his limited vision THINKS happened. The title of his muck-raking is "What Happened?" It hasn't proved Bush is an idiot.

So that what one would buy is just a private opinion. It's not the truth. If the opinions were true, Scott would be gloating (like you) in hindsight. What's happened was hardly something he knew was happening. He's safe calling the shot only afterward. (Monday morning quarterback.)

He has watched, as everybody has; the Left's media call Iraq a "quagmire." He bought that idea and because it's been public opinion in many circles, adopts the same view. Not because it's all true. Because he thinks Bush wasn't cool. He made mistakes.

It's easy to point at mistakes in hindsight. When they were being made, Bush had to act on foresight, not 20-20 hindsight. That's the advantage his enemies use. In sports we call it taking cheap shots.

BTW; what is it you're in a majority of? Hatred of America? We're the majority who love America.

Incredible Foresight
Most of the American people had incredible foresight, knowing that Bush & Co were gaming the system. Now that we can point to insiders who are telling the truth, it is called hindsight. How many books by various people in the loop have to be written before the average neo-con understands that Bush isn't capable of running a hotdog stand let alone a country.

Maybe the neo-cons want to start calling us aware citizens instead of making fun of their own folly by telling us we have nothing but hindsight.

When you are correct all along it is not called 20-20 hindsight, is it dread? Are you not now saying that Jack is correct, and that you fail to have even the hindsight to understand that Boosh is an idiot?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*